top of page

PLLA (Poly-L-Lactic Acid): Gradual, Natural Facial Rejuvenation Through Collagen Stimulation

  • Writer: Dr.Ebru Söylemez
    Dr.Ebru Söylemez
  • Jan 11
  • 2 min read


When facial rejuvenation is discussed today, the conversation has clearly moved beyond traditional fillers.As I mentioned in my previous article comparing CaHA, PLLA, and PCL, we are now in the era of biostimulators—treatments designed to restore skin quality by stimulating your own collagen, rather than simply adding volume.

Among these advanced options, Poly-L-Lactic Acid (PLLA) stands out for patients who seek gradual, natural-looking rejuvenation and long-lasting improvement in overall skin structure.


🔬 What Is PLLA?

PLLA is a biodegradable, biostimulatory injectable that works by activating fibroblasts—the cells responsible for collagen production.

Unlike traditional fillers:

  • PLLA does not provide immediate volume

  • Its effect develops progressively over weeks to months

After injection, PLLA particles trigger a controlled inflammatory response that leads to new collagen synthesis, improving skin thickness, firmness, and elasticity over time.


✨ Why Patients Choose PLLA

Patients who prefer PLLA usually value natural change over instant results.

Key advantages include:

  • ✔ Gradual, subtle rejuvenation

  • ✔ Long-lasting results (18–24 months)

  • ✔ Improved skin texture and firmness

  • ✔ No “overfilled” appearance

  • ✔ Ideal for global facial rejuvenation


Because the results develop slowly, friends and family often notice that patients look more refreshed, without being able to pinpoint why.


👤 Who Is the Ideal Candidate for PLLA?

Based on both clinical experience and what I discussed in my earlier comparison article, PLLA is especially suitable for:

  • Patients over 40 years old

  • Individuals with generalized volume loss

  • Faces that appear tired, hollow, or flattened

  • Patients who prioritize long-term improvement over instant lifting


PLLA is commonly used for:

  • Full-face rejuvenation

  • Temples and mid-face volume loss

  • Jawline support

  • Skin quality improvement rather than contour sculpting


⚠️ Important Considerations

PLLA is a powerful tool—but it requires expertise.

  • Results are not immediate

  • Multiple sessions may be needed

  • Proper dilution, injection depth, and massage technique are essential

  • Treatment must be performed by an experienced medical professional


When used incorrectly, outcomes may be unpredictable. When used correctly, results are exceptionally natural and durable.


🔬 What Does the Science Say? (PubMed Overview)

PLLA has been extensively studied in PubMed-indexed medical journals:

  • Clinical studies confirm significant collagen neogenesis following PLLA injections

  • Long-term follow-ups show sustained aesthetic improvement up to 24 months

  • PLLA has a long history of safe use in both aesthetic and reconstructive medicine

Publications in journals such as Dermatologic Surgery and Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology highlight its effectiveness when proper technique and patient selection are applied.


⚖️ PLLA Compared to Other Biostimulators

As outlined in my previous article:

  • CaHA → Immediate lift + collagen stimulation

  • PLLA → Gradual, natural, global rejuvenation

  • PCL → Long-lasting collagen stimulation with structure


There is no universal “best” option—only the most suitable treatment for each individual face.


✍️ Final Thoughts: Is PLLA Right for You?

PLLA is an excellent choice if you want:

  • Natural-looking rejuvenation

  • Long-term collagen rebuilding

  • A refreshed appearance without obvious volume changes


Successful PLLA treatment depends on:

  • Correct indication

  • Proper technique

  • Realistic expectations

  • An experienced practitioner


📌 A personalized consultation is essential to determine whether PLLA—or another biostimulator—is the best option for your facial structure and goals.


If you would like to learn more or create a customized treatment plan, feel free to contact us.

 
 
 

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page